Woohoo!!!
[RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
- grandcross
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Rocket Workbench with OpenRocket imports now available for testing. Like the rocket shown, this is an alpha meaning there may still be significant bugs so save important files.
Installation instructions are available here: https://github.com/davesrocketshop/Rock ... TESTING.md
The current testing branch is dev3_0_alpha1_01092023
The OpenRocket imports do not currently support the following features:
- Clusters
- Pods
- Parallel stages
- Non structural components such as parachutes and mass objects
- Materials, colors, decals, etc
Installation instructions are available here: https://github.com/davesrocketshop/Rock ... TESTING.md
The current testing branch is dev3_0_alpha1_01092023
The OpenRocket imports do not currently support the following features:
- Clusters
- Pods
- Parallel stages
- Non structural components such as parachutes and mass objects
- Materials, colors, decals, etc
- grandcross
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
New alpha branch of the Rocket Workbench available for testing. Installation instructions are available here: https://github.com/davesrocketshop/Rock ... TESTING.md
The current testing branch is dev3_0_alpha2_01202023
Many imporvements in this release:
- file save/restore bugs fixed, including from previous versions
- autosizing components
-nose cone, transition diameters
-centering rings
- TTW tabs
- improved main menu bar
- autodiameter for conformal and V rail guides
- many minor bugs
The current testing branch is dev3_0_alpha2_01202023
Many imporvements in this release:
- file save/restore bugs fixed, including from previous versions
- autosizing components
-nose cone, transition diameters
-centering rings
- TTW tabs
- improved main menu bar
- autodiameter for conformal and V rail guides
- many minor bugs
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2023 11:28 pm
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Hi @grandcross,
I have been working on a fin design in Rocket Workbench, and I have it to a point where I'm pleased with it and would like to 3D print it. Unfortunately, I'm running into issues with the cross sections of the fins where they come to knife edges, such as in the tapers and aerofoil. I'm not sure if this is a feature request, or if I'm just not seeing a setting somewhere, but is it possible to set a minimum width on the cross sections so that I can have them come down to a rounded face at 0.2mm wide or so instead of a knife-edge so that the models can be sliced and printed properly?
If this is a new feature request and you'd prefer I open up a Github issue, I'd be happy to do so.
Thanks for all your work on Rocket Workbench!
proto
I have been working on a fin design in Rocket Workbench, and I have it to a point where I'm pleased with it and would like to 3D print it. Unfortunately, I'm running into issues with the cross sections of the fins where they come to knife edges, such as in the tapers and aerofoil. I'm not sure if this is a feature request, or if I'm just not seeing a setting somewhere, but is it possible to set a minimum width on the cross sections so that I can have them come down to a rounded face at 0.2mm wide or so instead of a knife-edge so that the models can be sliced and printed properly?
If this is a new feature request and you'd prefer I open up a Github issue, I'd be happy to do so.
Thanks for all your work on Rocket Workbench!
proto
- grandcross
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
It's software... anything is possible!protoCall7 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 11:32 pm Hi @grandcross,
I have been working on a fin design in Rocket Workbench, and I have it to a point where I'm pleased with it and would like to 3D print it. Unfortunately, I'm running into issues with the cross sections of the fins where they come to knife edges, such as in the tapers and aerofoil. I'm not sure if this is a feature request, or if I'm just not seeing a setting somewhere, but is it possible to set a minimum width on the cross sections so that I can have them come down to a rounded face at 0.2mm wide or so instead of a knife-edge so that the models can be sliced and printed properly?
If this is a new feature request and you'd prefer I open up a Github issue, I'd be happy to do so.
Thanks for all your work on Rocket Workbench!
proto
Sounds like a great idea, but it's not a small change. It will take some time. I would prefer a GitHub issue if you wouldn't mind. That will also get you updates as the enhancement progresses. And thanks for the feedback.
- grandcross
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
And done!
New FreeCAD release supporting minimum edge sizes for fins.
New FreeCAD release supporting minimum edge sizes for fins.
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Bravo!
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Hello, 1st, thanks for all the work that's been done on this! I've been looking for a way to use openrocket files for 3d printing for a long time.
I've run into an issue where what I see in FreeCAD after I open an openrocket file is not what is exported to any other format.
I just grabbed a random .ork file and was going to use it as a fin can test.
This is what I have in FreeCAD; And this is what I get when I export it to a .STL I get the same output no matter what file type I choose to export it as.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
I've run into an issue where what I see in FreeCAD after I open an openrocket file is not what is exported to any other format.
I just grabbed a random .ork file and was going to use it as a fin can test.
This is what I have in FreeCAD; And this is what I get when I export it to a .STL I get the same output no matter what file type I choose to export it as.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
- grandcross
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
Nothing I can think of off the top of my head. Are you able to attach the .ork so I can have a look?
- grandcross
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] Rocketry Workbench
In the absence of your specific file, I searched for one similar. I was able to produce this model similar to yours
I'm not sure what steps you took to export your file to .stl but it's very easy to do wrong. If you select the root node (Rocket in your diagram) and export, you'll get a file but it won't be correct. My results are different than yours but still not correct
The fundamental problem is that these aren't a single shape, but multiple independent shapes. You have to combine them into one first. To do this switch to the Part workbench.
The short description of the process is that you select the objects you want to "fuse" into a single object, and produce one solid object. In this case though the steps aren't as simple as that. For example, if I select as follows:
When I select the fusion operation I produce no fusion and I get this error in the report view:
(continued...)
I'm not sure what steps you took to export your file to .stl but it's very easy to do wrong. If you select the root node (Rocket in your diagram) and export, you'll get a file but it won't be correct. My results are different than yours but still not correct
The fundamental problem is that these aren't a single shape, but multiple independent shapes. You have to combine them into one first. To do this switch to the Part workbench.
The short description of the process is that you select the objects you want to "fuse" into a single object, and produce one solid object. In this case though the steps aren't as simple as that. For example, if I select as follows:
When I select the fusion operation I produce no fusion and I get this error in the report view:
(continued...)