I can't think of anything that a user could do to change this. Even if you could force treating the bspline as a circle, the radius and center might not be what you expect. A bit of GIGO.alivetechs wrote: ↑Sun Jun 05, 2022 9:24 pm any way I could force them to be interpreted as circles maybe? Because when they fall into said tolerance factor, I'm able to dimension them perfectly fine.
This is an error. If the bspline can not be coerced into being a circle, the current code continues the attempt to make a dimension instead of abandoning the attempt.alivetechs wrote: ↑Sun Jun 05, 2022 9:24 pm Side question: is it normal that when I try to dimension them as splines I always get a dimension of zero appearing completely off in the center of the view? (sure there is a warning telling me the diameter will be approximate, but here it simply fails in the end I think)
The circles aren't quite identical. In the picture, the black squares are the poles of the 2 bsplines. The rotation of the "circle" is probably enough to confuse the algorithm.alivetechs wrote: And it's also puzzling that in the first view, all 19 small circles that are supposed to be identical, sometimes fall into the tolerance and sometimes not nope?
) so I'll try to do a PR anyway. I think I'll have to create a GH issue first. I'll report back when the PR is merged.