Well, I think the thing that stopped me understanding it was really the idea of "matching/linking/connecting local co-ordinate systems" rather than the linking/matching terminology.Zolko wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 1:07 pm
a coordinate system is a precise mathematical construct, we should not rename it. But you're right that "linking" them is probably not the correct terminology. What about "connecting local coordinate systems (LCS)" ? Would that be easier to understand ?
The Assembly4 documentation is now quite outdated, if you have proposals to improve would be helpful.
As I user, I know I want to connect e.g. THIS point on an axle to THAT point on a wheel. The fact that this is achieved in Assembly4 by matching local coordinate systems is not necessarily something the user needs to worry about I think - in my case it was a positive hindrance.
Anyway, was just a thought!