Page 2 of 2

Re: FEM: Result node Numbers are not equal to FEM Mesh NodeCount.

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:50 am
by NewJoker
Mysharona wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:55 pm So should I put in "welds" to fill in gaps?
If you are aware of some gaps between the parts, it might be necessary to close them in the model. Otherwise, you would have to connect the parts with tie constraints but it can be difficult since after making the union/compound shape you can't normally hide components and select the proper faces for connection.

Re: FEM: Result node Numbers are not equal to FEM Mesh NodeCount.

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2022 2:22 am
by Mysharona
So I have updated my Gmsh and remade my model. https://1drv.ms/u/s!AmYON7Y7WUFEnHD10LP ... Q?e=fWtcv0
I have it working now. In doing so I think, although I don't know, that Part Compound, Fusion, and boolean, along with A2+ have problems with topological naming issues. More so the specific constraints.