FreeCAD and ParaView
Moderator: bernd
Forum rules
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
FreeCAD and ParaView
I rely heavily on ParaView in my posts and recent tutorial (https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/Analysi ... e_with_FEM) and wonder if that is seen as a help or hindrens (to spreading the FreeCAD gospel). I would be happy to do a small ParaView tutorial with some practical tips and tricks, but that may annoy FreeCAD purists even more?! I would be interested to get your opinion on this matter.
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
Since ATM paraview has much much much more features than FreeCAD FEM I personally see no problem in such a tutorial on FEM wiki pages of FreeCAD. IMHO it is the other way around. This would even more attrac users to use FreeCAD FEM.
Personally I really like to see this happen, since my knowledge of paraview is rather small.
bernd
Personally I really like to see this happen, since my knowledge of paraview is rather small.
bernd
- kkremitzki
- Veteran
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:52 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
I would appreciate such a tutorial as well.
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
Add me to the +ParaView vote.
It already has most of what FreeCAD FEM post-processing wants to be.
It's open source and cross-platform. We all need to build the toolbox.
FreeCAD can't be everything, to everyone, all the time.....yet
It already has most of what FreeCAD FEM post-processing wants to be.
It's open source and cross-platform. We all need to build the toolbox.
FreeCAD can't be everything, to everyone, all the time.....yet
"fight the good fight"
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 1:31 pm
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
+1
All Tutorials are welcome!
I also use paraview for postprocessing and there are a huge options that I never use it.
All Tutorials are welcome!
I also use paraview for postprocessing and there are a huge options that I never use it.
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
5 in favor and 9995 abstentions. Another resounding victory for democracy and a clear mandate to progress
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
That's tragically hillarious
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
To close votes so quickly is pretty dictatorial
+1
Such tutorial would be great!
+1
Such tutorial would be great!
Re: FreeCAD and ParaView
Sorry for my late reply. I am not that experienced in Paraview because I mostly use Mathematica for nearly the same stuff. To reduce the dependency on closed-source software, at least for me, an FEA centered post-processing tutorial for Paraview would be very useful! So, please go aheadHarryvL wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:56 pm I rely heavily on ParaView in my posts and recent tutorial (https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/Analysi ... e_with_FEM) and wonder if that is seen as a help or hindrens (to spreading the FreeCAD gospel). I would be happy to do a small ParaView tutorial with some practical tips and tricks, but that may annoy FreeCAD purists even more?! I would be interested to get your opinion on this matter.
Best wishes
Johannes