FreeCAD Forum

Kunda1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:38 am @HarryvL both dependencies are now in the Snap, please test and report back. Thanks!

latest/edge/toponaming works well for my test cases. Thanks again.

Wondering why you're using toponaming branch? Why not edge ?

ppd wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:21 am This will land in latest/edge (and in latest/edge/toponaming) tomorrow.

This why.

Sorry, my bad.

wow ... I have not read all the posts. Yeah I had a good reason for not loggin in ... https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=70061 I do much less FEM development ATM. Yes I know I broke fcFEM for the future it is much simpler to add new solves the way the objects are collected ATM.

Have you solved all the problems? Does fcFEM again run on latest FreeCAD? Do you still need any help?

It all works as before. I am now spending time to improve the interface routines, so I can analyse multiple intersections, as for example in brick work. I will post some examples when it’s done.

Great to see this working again.

Have you seen how examples are handled lately? All coded in Python! https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/tree ... emexamples

Great to see this working again.

Have you seen how examples are handled lately? All coded in Python! https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/tree ... emexamples

May be we could run a few off them with fcFEM too?

AFAIK all of them have a solver writer unit test too.

Yes that’s a good idea. Once I get the interfaces fixed and code cleaned up I will do that.

I also need to learn how to do unit tests so we get a warning when incompatible changes are made in FC.

git commit 005c66f4ecc7fb should give you an idea what needs to be done ...

BTW examples are automatically added to the FEM examples GUI. Have you given this FEM examples GUI a try yourself? It makes it very easy to play with FEM examples.