Let's talk version numbers
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: Let's talk version numbers
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: Let's talk version numbers
I am missing in this list
Re: Let's talk version numbers
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
- adrianinsaval
- Veteran
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Re: Let's talk version numbers
Proposal for this dev cycle: name master branch releases 0.98, toponaming branch 0.99.1 for the first merge and increase for each subsequent merge this will make it very easy to differentiate what each person is running.
Re: Let's talk version numbers
I would suggest 1.0 should be when we have toponaming officially declared as solved (not necessarily after realthunder's branch is merged). Whatever is before that, we keep going with 0.21, 0.22...
Re: Let's talk version numbers
I think we should have a unified assembly workbench along with Toponaming that would constitute a 1.0 label.
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: Let's talk version numbers
I am confused. In 3 meetings we spoke about how to proceed now and I acted accordingly. Toponaming should be the development goal and then we have a FreeCAD 1.0. Also that this is the only hard goal, everything else is developed in parallel.
So FC 1.0 is ready when toponaming is almost no more an issue. This could be in 6 months or one year.
I announced this accordingly. I thought this info was communicated transparent in our meeting protocols, here in the devel forum and now also in the 0.20 release announcement. The announcement text was co-written by chennes who also attended all meetings and obviously understood it the same way as I did.
However, the info is out and there is no way back , full force to fight toponaming and for FreeCAD 1.0!
- adrianinsaval
- Veteran
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 pm