Avoid coplanar faces. Here I have shifted Fusion002 by -0.1mm in Y direction.

may24x wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 1:43 pm Wie man auf meinem ersten Screenshot sieht

Ich dachte, dass Du es gar nicht so haben wolltest. Ich verstehe also nicht was Du eigentlich willst. Vielleicht machst Du das noch mal klar. Dann kriegst Du auch geholfen.

Colleagues, you are diligently deflecting the question. The essence of the problem = inadequate behavior of the solver, which needs refactoring. The sub-questions are. 1. There are many FC assemblies. Most of them are branches with upgrades of separate parts, like Path, topo nam..., etc. What a way...

Krischu wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 12:18 pm

Was möchtest Du uns mit diesem Beitrag sagen?

Please search the forum, this was already discussed before.

You could do this as you describe, but that's not the feature driven PartDesign way, but rather the CSG approach from Part. In PartDesign you create a pocket - which creates the same result as the pad, which then is subtracted.

Die Größe der Felder hängt vom Zeichensatz und der Auflösung ab. Als Zeichensatz verwendet FraaCAD die Systemeinstellungen.

I'm trying to avoid using the part bench as the rest of the model was built in part design (and I typically run into issues when I attempt to combine the two It is not illegal, you just have to do it right, and starting in one workbench and continuing in another is manageable: - Create your B-splin...

Outsourced wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 10:52 pm Its at the top of the forum post

Then you should link from the videos to this discussion. The recommended way is to show the version number in the video.

Moved to Assembly forum. This branch is discussed here.