No matter how I tried, I couldn’t get used to the behavior of the “automatic” tools. I set up a custom panel for myself (it’s just a blessing to have such an opportunity). You can change from a single dimension tool to show all dimensional constraint tools in the sketcher preferences: Screenshot fr...

And again, the flipping is caused by the equals constraint, not by the hor/ver distance constraints. Replace equal with a vertical constraint and flipping does not occur: not fipping.png This leads me to think Jolbas is right, that horizontal and vertical distance constraints (thus also lock) alrea...

jruiz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 2:31 pm It's clear that the following is not a demonstration...

File?

Change the horizontal 10mm constraint to 60mm and the sketch flips: The cause of the flipping is the geometrical constraint 7, which means the horizontal line has no direction. However, there is no flipping between the relative points of the horizontal/vertical constraints. To make the sketch immun...

obelisk79 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 1:47 am Also, I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean by rescale on the first dimension, could you elaborate?

viewtopic.php?t=58172

OriginalContent wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:26 pm Could you share the location of Ondsel's Integrated Assembly WB appImage?

Here is the link: https://ondsel.com/blog/assembly-wb-prerelease

I can imagine a minimal risk, when external geometry is involved. If external geometry is involved, the sketch should probably not scale because it already has a length/constant dimension element. And no, this should definitely not be a preference. I consider the current behaviour is a bug, scaling...

I am all in favor of this.

I might be wrong but is it not the case that pad/pocket with taper turns edges to bsplines? There were some discussion about it here: viewtopic.php?t=65124