Search found 3345 matches

by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:19 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: Compiling with FC_USE_TNP_FIX
Replies: 3
Views: 109

Re: Compiling with FC_USE_TNP_FIX

chennes wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:12 pm This flag is purely temporary
That is clear to me. But when it lats longer then a few weeks, then it should be added. There was so many flags added lately, i do not think, that one will be a bonebracker. And to keep the threshold low to get more values.


Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:00 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: Compiling with FC_USE_TNP_FIX
Replies: 3
Views: 109

Re: Compiling with FC_USE_TNP_FIX

chennes wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:48 pm FC_USE_TNP_FIX
It would be convenient, when it is a preconfigured flag (and off) (or have it overseen it?) like many other preconfigured flags. Or is it only planned for a few days. I assume, that is a longer task.


Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:36 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

The issues are not the sketches, the problem are the coplanarity of the lofts.

e.g.

2024-03-28_20-36.webm
(238.02 KiB) Downloaded 1 time

Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:09 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

chrisb wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:50 pm but good to see that it is fixed
In counter, there was yesterday an issue, you could not delete or edit constraints in the sketcher. It have also its downsides.


Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:07 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Integrated Assembly workbench
Replies: 24
Views: 1229

Re: Integrated Assembly workbench

What happens when you open an assembly file, that contains many other (sub)assemblies and many many parts and bodies, all in other files linked. Alone the check of that consumes rescues. I have now open a file with 123 different files and min. 123 parts/assemblies with min. twice of bodies, how it w...
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:47 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

chrisb wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:40 pm This is what I see on opening your file
I use also 0.22main (a few hours old), but i also do not get these errors. Only the normal follow up errors due TNP.


Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:17 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

So now i have dense it down. Also now i can replicate the exclamation mark fro chrisb. The issue are the many coplanar cuts due lofts. When i change e.g. SketchSole in z direction a little bit, it works instant. But then you get issues with the other lofts (e.g. TNP and other loft issues). Normally ...
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:00 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

It start to work when relink the LoftMortiseFromTop.


2024-03-28_19-01.png
2024-03-28_19-01.png (173.39 KiB) Viewed 143 times

After recomputing the sketches below, it gets error in the lofts. I think there is something fishy in the sketches.


Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:31 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

steve355 wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:26 pm I think those might by "old" sketches that I thought were gone.
In fact the error area with that many sweeps overlaps (which do not self intersect, which is good) is indeed very tattered. But i do not know, if that many sweeps was on purpose.


Greetings
user1234
by user1234
Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:16 pm
Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
Topic: Help with Pocketing
Replies: 23
Views: 483

Re: Help with Pocketing

The tree shows an error (exclamation mark) which must be fixed: I do not have this, also no TNP. The only issue i found, is that the geometry from the initialed body SideEscapementBody have many geometry errors on top (the side, where it gets cut). I do not have found the reason for that, but i thi...