Thank you, I'll bring this up for discussion with other porters when submitting the port.wmayer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:31 pm The most relevant utilities are:I don't think that any of the others are needed by FreeCAD.Code: Select all
@bin bin/lrelease @bin bin/lupdate @bin bin/rcc @bin bin/uic
Search found 84 matches
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:44 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:07 am
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
wmayer The pyside6-tools package installs some binaries that are named very generically (e.g. deploy.py, project.py, assistant). I'm considering following what was done for the FreeBSD package and store these binaries under a dedicated directory e.g. /usr/local/bin/pyside6-tools/. However I'm not s...
- Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:11 am
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
An interesting effort, which I applaud; the work of porting is a great way to uncover issues and make improvements in areas that rarely see any attention, so kudos to you and I look forward to seeing continued updates. Thank you for the kind words kkremitzki , they motivate me a lot. I'm almost fin...
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:05 am
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
I studied this topic a bit more, and I am thinking that porting to OpenBSD could be non-sensical, because the port already exists for FreeBSD, and the reason is that FreeBSD is more general-purpose than OpenBSD. I am not sure, if people will actually want to run CAD on OpenBSD, because OpenBSD seem...
- Wed Nov 08, 2023 12:28 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
This is not exactly what I was asking for. I am asking for a way to know how to avoid duplicate work in case someone has already fixed a part of a port or a dependency port. Once again, you can clone my personal git repo of WIP ports and make any tweaks you want. If you want me to include those cha...
- Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:29 am
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
Can you set up some more organized place for keeping track of things, in particular ports of dependencies? As explained in the top post, you can find my work on the dependencies in my personal repo which you can clone (see the ssh://anon... url) and tweak as you please. Further, I am not sure what ...
- Mon Oct 30, 2023 6:46 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
If you prefer you can use trelau's fork of SMESH https://github.com/trelau/SMESH which was/is used for the Conda builds AFAIK Ah nice! I see that other distros (e.g. fedora) are using this fork for their ports. I'll see how far I can get with it. Thanks! The C++ library is sufficient. Got it, thanks!
- Sun Oct 29, 2023 3:06 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
@wmayer Also, regarding orocos-kdl, are the python bindings needed? Or only the C++ library?
- Sun Oct 29, 2023 2:28 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
@wmayer, I see most ports out there use the Salome SMESH included in the FreeCAD source tree. Is there any specific reason for this? Also I'm having trouble finding documentation on how to compile it from source. Could you perhaps provide any useful hints about this please?
- Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:42 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
- Replies: 58
- Views: 32631
Re: [WIP] OpenBSD Port
Yes, but I found no guarantees that even make clean is implemented by the Makefile. The targets are not defined in the port Makefile, but are included by the line .include <bsd.port.mk> . Please consider asking questions that are not specific to the FreeCAD port in the mailing list (ports@openbsd.o...