Search found 5264 matches
- Tue Aug 16, 2022 10:30 am
- Forum: Help on using FreeCAD
- Topic: Workflow for Arch / BIM bathroom with fixtures
- Replies: 1
- Views: 108
Re: Workflow for Arch / BIM bathroom with fixtures
Where do you get the idea that an 'International Building Code' exists?
- Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:20 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: Issue #7370 - Arch Wall not visible when base sketch lines overlap after sketch edit
- Replies: 2
- Views: 164
Re: Issue #7370 - Arch Wall not visible when base sketch lines overlap after sketch edit
I think that I already have a fix for this. See https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 27#p581127
It is one of the PRs that I have 'parked' during the feature freeze.
It is one of the PRs that I have 'parked' during the feature freeze.
- Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:03 am
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: One Object in 2 Layers / Groups / Building Parts
- Replies: 8
- Views: 489
Re: One Object in 2 Layers / Groups / Building Parts
The Ctrl+Drop behavior has changed between V0.19.1 and V0.19.2. In V0.19.1 you can hold down Ctrl and Drop an object nested in a Group on a Layer, the object is then added to the Layer and not removed from the Group. In V0.19.2 and later this is no longer possible, the object is first removed from t...
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
- Replies: 15
- Views: 491
Re: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
Workaround for Example_for_forum3(cut with plane).FCStd: Create a Part_ElementCopy from a face of the column and a face of the beam. Make sure Std_TreeSyncPlacement is off. Move the copies into the correct Part containers. Select the beam and the copied column face and call Part_SliceApart . Move th...
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:20 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
- Replies: 15
- Views: 491
Re: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
Workaround for Example_for_forum2.FCStd: Create a Link ( Std_LinkMake ) from the Cube. Change its "Link Transform" property to true. Make sure Std_TreeSyncPlacement is off. Drop it in Part. Use the following expression for its Link Placement Position: Part001.Placement.Base - href(Part.Pla...
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:09 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
- Replies: 15
- Views: 491
Re: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
These are not edge cases, if a new system is devised it should include support for them. Note that what you want also results in out of scope links.
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:44 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
- Replies: 15
- Views: 491
Re: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
With the current Link system objects can have multiple parents. So it is probably not as straightforward as you may think.gbParametric wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:29 pm you can check if component object is inside a App.Part with :
compobject.getParentGeoFeatureGroup()
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:42 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
- Replies: 15
- Views: 491
Re: Subtractions/Additions when Arch.Component is placed in App.Part
What is your reason for putting the Subtraction object in a different Std_Part, with a different Placement, from the component that you want to subtract from? Can you clarify your intended workflow?
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 12:31 pm
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: One Object in 2 Layers / Groups / Building Parts
- Replies: 8
- Views: 489
Re: One Object in 2 Layers / Groups / Building Parts
Holding down the Ctrl key should govern this behavior IMO.
- Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:04 am
- Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
- Topic: One Object in 2 Layers / Groups / Building Parts
- Replies: 8
- Views: 489
Re: One Object in 2 Layers / Groups / Building Parts
... Actually the Layer class already has a addObject method. But this never executes AFAICT.